Tuesday, January 22, 2008

NO PETS means NO PETS

From an article in The Daily Mail:

Given that she describes herself as a human pet – and is happy to walk around on a lead – Tasha Maltby is used to odd looks and even odder remarks.

But nothing had prepared her for the reaction of the bus driver who allegedly told the self-styled Goth and her boyfriend: "We don't let freaks and dogs like you on."

Miss Maltby and her fiance Dani Graves were so angered they have complained to the bus company of being "victimised".

"It is definitely discrimination, almost like a hate crime," 19-year-old Miss Maltby said yesterday.

The music technology student had this defence of her lifestyle.

"I am a pet, I generally act animal like and I lead a really easy life," she said.

"I don't cook or clean and I don't go anywhere without Dani. It might seem strange but it makes us both happy. It's my culture and my choice. It isn't hurting anyone."

The bus driver, however, has obviously not been listening.

He has repeatedly refused to allow Mr Graves, 25, and his "pet" on to his bus in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire.

Last month, with Miss Maltby on a leash as usual, the couple tried to board a bus at the bus station.

The driver, who was off duty, was standing near the door.

Mr Graves alleged: "He shoved me off the bus. He called us freaks and he called Tasha a dog.

"He said, 'We don't let freaks and dogs like you on'.

"He basically grabbed my T-shirt and slammed me backwards.

"I got a bit angry and called him a fascist pig."

In a separate incident, police were called when the driver, who has not been named, refused to allow other passengers on board after the couple ignored his orders and sat down.

The couple, who live on benefits in a council house and plan to start a family, have been friends for years.

They started going out together in July and became engaged in November.

Paul Adcock, of bus company Arriva Yorkshire, said: "We take any allegations of discrimination seriously.

"Mr Graves has already contacted us directly and as soon as our investigation has concluded we will inform him of the outcome."

I'm all for fair treatment so it surprises me that I'm...not on their side. You can't call yourself a pet and expect treatments that exclude other pets though, can you? CAN YOU? It's because I can't let go of that semi-vacant look in her eyes. She wants it to say, I am an independent citizen and have chosen this lifestyle, but the signals, they are so mixed, when her arrogant boyfriend holds a leash--made for dogs--nonchalantly in his hand. A gesture which says, I'm holding onto this for show, like when I let my dog shit outside in the middle of the night. He knows Sparky isn't going anywhere but it's a formality. She won't run away, we love each other.
Barf. The very representation, as you may have noticed, makes my blood boil.

Also, I sincerely doubt either popped out of the womb intrigued with the morbid details of life. I bet her My Little Ponies are in her bedroom closet right now. Still, it's the ownership of another human and objectification of women that bug me. And the BLATANT IRONY of wanting human treatment.

1 comment:

You know said...

There are simply some places where pets should not be found.

And, there are some people who should not be taking up precious space on the planet. Those people would be anyone who considers themselves to be a pet and the people who want to have a person as a pet. Its simply a waste of space